<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: citizen kane (1941)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hopelies.com/2009/03/17/citizen-kane-1941/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hopelies.com/2009/03/17/citizen-kane-1941/</link>
	<description>Silent Film and French Cinema in the age of the digital. Et al.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 16:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://hopelies.com/2009/03/17/citizen-kane-1941/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hopeliesat24framespersecond.wordpress.com/2009/03/17/citizen-kane-1941/#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think its much better a film when viewed outside of education, as are most. for me there is just something so incredibly modern about the film, it still holds up today, but at the same time created a lot of the cinematic devices that we hold as standard today, so its kinda a double edged compliment. im surprised you didnt find it as accessible and overtly enjoyable, but i guess a lot of people feel that way about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think its much better a film when viewed outside of education, as are most. for me there is just something so incredibly modern about the film, it still holds up today, but at the same time created a lot of the cinematic devices that we hold as standard today, so its kinda a double edged compliment. im surprised you didnt find it as accessible and overtly enjoyable, but i guess a lot of people feel that way about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filmgeek</title>
		<link>http://hopelies.com/2009/03/17/citizen-kane-1941/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[filmgeek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hopeliesat24framespersecond.wordpress.com/2009/03/17/citizen-kane-1941/#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve got to be honest, I have only seen this film once and was made to see it for film class. I liked it but I thought it was incredibly over-rated. I mean, it is meant to be THE film. But why? I enjoyed watching it but it&#039;s not a film I feel compelled to watch over and over and I think there are many films more worthy of the status this film holds (although I can&#039;t think of any examples right now. This takes a great deal of thought...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to be honest, I have only seen this film once and was made to see it for film class. I liked it but I thought it was incredibly over-rated. I mean, it is meant to be THE film. But why? I enjoyed watching it but it&#8217;s not a film I feel compelled to watch over and over and I think there are many films more worthy of the status this film holds (although I can&#8217;t think of any examples right now. This takes a great deal of thought&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

